3Back to Articles

Introduction to International Screening

by Lester S. Rosen

Employers have long recognized that conducting due diligence on new hires is a mission critical task. Firms cannot afford to be sidetracked by employee problems such as workplace violence, theft, false resumes, embezzlement, harassment or trumped-up injury claims. Employers can be the subject of lawsuits for negligent hiring if they hire someone that they should have known, through the exercise of due diligence, was dangerous, unfit or unqualified.

However, with the mobility of workers across international borders it is no longer adequate to conduct these checks just in the United States. A 2000 government study shows that 11.5% of the population consists of immigrants. In addition, an increasing number of workers have spent part of their professional career abroad. The number of countries from which employers seek additional information about applicants is expansive, and includes India, China, Philippines, France, Germany, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, Australia, Japan, Canada, among others.

International Background Screening Perceived As Difficult
Because of the perceived difficulty in performing international employment screening, some employers have not attempted to verify international credentials or to perform foreign criminal checks. However, the mere fact that information may be more difficult to obtain from outside of the U.S. does not relieve an employer from their due diligence obligation.

Nor can employers simply assume that the U.S. government has conducted background checks if the worker was issued a visa. After the events of 9/11, the U.S. has increased checks on foreign visitors and on workers on government "watch lists." However, the government checks are generally not aimed at verifying a credential or checking for criminal records for employment purposes.

To exercise due diligence in hiring, employers should consider screening internationally for criminal records, employment, education, and publicly available terrorist lists.

Criminal Records
When it comes to criminal records, each and every country is completely different. The availability of public records that is taken for granted here in the United States is often times not available abroad. In some countries, records are available at the courthouse, similar to how criminal records are obtained in the US. In other countries, records can be obtained from a police agency. In some countries, the best course is to have the applicant obtain their own certificate of good conduct from their local police station.

For criminal records searches, it is important to know exactly where the person has lived to ensure you are searching the appropriate court. Keep in mind also that that turnaround time for international criminal searches takes longer than domestic searches. Different countries also have different rules on the level of searches, but in most countries it is possible to obtain information of offenses that are at the felony level.

Another concern is name variations. Many countries have naming convention that is different then the US, such as the use of the mother's name. Complications can also arise for applicants whose name is based on a non-English alphabet, such as Chinese, Arabic or Japanese. There are numerous ways that such names can be translated into English.

Privacy and data protection is another crucial issue. For example, the European Union has passed strong privacy rules affecting how personal data can be obtained and utilized. U.S. background firms that do international searches should be a member of the U.S. Department of Commerce Safe Harbor program, which demonstrates a commitment to the E.U. privacy and data protection rules.

Education
Verification of an educational degree earned abroad is critical to verify credentials and to avoid fraud. An employer needs to determine if an applicant in fact attended the school claimed and received the degree claimed. Statistics show that education fraud can run as high as 20%. The employer also needs to determine if the school is accredited and authentic. The world is awash with phony schools and worthless diplomas. If the employer is not familiar with a school, they should conduct their own research. A legitimate school will often have an e-mail address or phone number so that they can be contacted to verify a degree.

Employment
Foreign employment can also be verified by contacting the employer even though they are in a foreign country. Often such calls will be made in the middle of the night due to time differences. The critical step is to obtain as much information about the past employer as possible from the applicant. If the employer does not speak English, an interpreter may be needed.

Terrorist Lists
Other due diligence tools are the various terrorist databases available to the public, such as the Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") list maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Such lists are readily available but there are limitations as well, such as working with name matches only when no additional details are available. To locate a list of web sites containing publicly available lists, and for more information on international background checks, go to: www.esrcheck.com/international.php.

Lester S. Rosen is an attorney at law and President of Employment Screening Resources (www.ESRcheck.com), a national background screening company headquartered in Novato, California. He is the author of, The Safe Hiring Manual--Complete Guide to Keeping Criminals, Imposters and Terrorists Out of Your Workplace (512 pages-Facts on Demand Press), the first comprehensive book on employment screening. He is a frequent speaker nationwide on pre-employment screening and safe hiring issues. He was the first co-chairman of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS), the organization for the background screening industry.

(c)2008 Lester S.Rosen

The Top 10 Signs You Are Hiring A Lawsuit Waiting To Happen

Reprinted from the SF Chronicle and www.HR.com

Employee lawsuits often catch employers by surprise. Yet, an examination of the employee's application shows that an employer could often have predicted well in advance that they were hiring a lawsuit just waiting to happen.

By looking for the following ten (10) danger signals, an employer can avoid hiring a problem in the first place.

1. Applicant does not sign application. An applicant with something to hide may purposely not sign the application form so they later cannot be accused of falsification.
2. Applicant does not sign consent for background screening. When a firm uses an outside agency to perform screening, federal law requires a separate disclosure and consent. A background consent form protects employers in two ways: It discourages applicants with something to hide and encourages candid interviews. If a firm does not perform some sort of screening, they become the employer of choice for problem applicants. If a candidate fails to sign the consent, that is not a good sign.
3. Applicant leaves criminal questions blank. An applicant with a past problem may simply skip the questions about criminal record. Every employment application should ask, in the broadest possible terms allowed by law, if the applicant has a criminal record. Most jurisdictions only permit questions about convictions and pending cases only. Employers make a big mistake if they only ask about felonies since misdemeanors can be extremely serious. Although employment may not be denied automatically because of a criminal conviction, an employer may consider the nature and gravity of the offense, the nature of the job and the age of the offense in evaluating whether there is a sound business reason not to employ someone with a criminal record. If an applicant lies about a criminal record however, the false application may be the reason to deny employment.
4. Applicant self-reports a criminal violation. Just because an applicant self-reports an offense does not eliminate the possibility of other offences, or that it was reported it in a misleading way to lessens its seriousness. An employer is well advised to check it out.
5. Applicant fails to explain gaps in employment history. It is critical to look for unexplained employment gaps. There can be many reasons for a gap in employment. However, if an applicant cannot account for the past seven to ten years, that can be a red flag. It is also important to know where a person has been because of the way criminal records are maintained in the United States. Contrary to popular belief, there is not a national criminal database available to most employers. Searches must be conducted at each relevant courthouse, and there are over 10,000 courthouses in America. However, if an employer knows where an applicant has been, it increases the accuracy of a criminal search, and decreases the possibility that an applicant has served time for a serious offense.
6. Applicant fails to give sufficient information to identify a past employer for reference checks. If an applicant does not give enough details about past employers, that can be a sign of trouble. Verifying past employment is a critical and important tool for safe hiring. Some employers make a costly mistake by not checking past employment because past employers may not give detailed information. However, even if a reference check only reveals dates of employment and job titles, this critical information eliminates employment gaps. In addition, documenting the fact that an effort was made will demonstrate due diligence.
7. Applicant fails to explain reason left past jobs. Past job performance can be an important predictor of future success.
8. Explanations for employment gaps or reasons for leaving past jobs do not make sense. A careful review of this section is needed and anything that does not make sense must to be cleared up in the interview.
9. Excessive cross-outs and changes. Can be an indication that an applicant is making it up as they go.
10. Applicant failed to indicate or cannot recall the name of a former supervisor. Another red flag. Past supervisors are important in order to conduct past employment checks.

These danger signs assume employers use an application form. Some employers put their firm at risk by just using just resumes. However, using an employment application is considered a best practice. Resumes are not always complete or clear. Applications ensure uniformity and all needed information is obtained. It also protects employers from having impermissible information a resume may contain, and provides employers with a place for applicants to sign necessary statements that are part of the hiring process. ©2001 Employment Screening Resources