|
|
|
This newsletter is sent to clients of Employment Screening Resources (ESR) and as well as employers, Human Resources and Security professionals and law firms who require information on pre-employment screening, safe hiring, the FCRA and legal compliance. If this was sent in error, you can be removed from this mailing by using the "remove" feature at the end of the newsletter. (Reading
time: Less than 5 minutes) Employment Screening Resources (ESR) Newsletter and Legal UpdateBest wishes this holiday season from everyone at
Employment Screening Resources (ESR) 1. The President Signs the "Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003" 2. Recidivism Study Demonstrates Needs for Criminal Checks 3. Legal and Illegal Interview Questions 4. Safe Hiring Training Available on Video 1. The President Signs the "Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003" On December 4, 2003, President Bush signed the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction (FACT) Act, reauthorizing the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The major thrusts of the new law are to retain
nationwide standards for credit reporting and to strengthen consumer rights
when it comes to credit issues. It also
has provisions to combat identity theft. For employers, the critical provision is the repeal of the "Vail"
letter, which hampered the ability of employers to conduct investigations of
current employees for misconduct though third-party investigators. This is particularly critical when it comes
to the investigation of sexual harassment claims or threats of workplace
violence. The text of the law is
available at: http://www.esrcheck.com/services/research.php 2. Recidivism Study Demonstrates Needs for Criminal Checks Employers are increasingly subject to negligent hiring lawsuits alleging that they hired someone that they either knew, or should have known, was dangerous or unfit for a particular job. The basic proposition is that a person with proven dangerous propensities in the past may well exhibit those traits in the future. Statistics seem to bear that out. The US Justice Department released a study in 2002 on recidivism that suggests recidivism within three years of release from a prison is as high as 67%. The data was from the largest recidivism study ever conducted in the United States, which tracked prisoners discharged in 15 states representing two-thirds of all state prisoners released in 1994. The study found that: • Most former convicts were rearrested shortly after getting out of prison: 30 percent within six months, 44 percent within a year, 59 percent within two years and 67 percent by the end of three years. • Post-prison recidivism was strongly related to arrest history. Among prisoners with one arrest prior to their release, 41 percent were rearrested. Of those with two prior arrests, 47 percent were rearrested. Of those with three earlier arrests, 55 percent were rearrested. Among those with more than 15 prior arrests, that is about 18 percent of all released prisoners, 82 percent were rearrested within the three-year period. • The 272,111 offenders discharged in 1994 had accumulated 4.1 million arrest charges before their most recent imprisonment and another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release. • The 272,111 inmates had accumulated more than 4.1 million arrest charges prior to their current imprisonment and acquired an additional 744,000 arrest charges in the 3 years following their discharge in 1994 - an average of about 18 criminal arrest charges per offender during their criminal careers. These charges included almost 21,000 homicides, 200,000 robberies, 50,000 rapes and sexual assaults and almost 300,000 assaults. (See http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/press/rpr94pr.htm ) Based upon these numbers, it is no wonder that employers face increased exposure for negligent hiring cases if precautions are not taken to perform background checks. As reported in a previous ESR newsletter, employers lose at least 60% of these cases, with an average award of three million dollars, not including attorney's fees. 3. Legal and Illegal Interview Questions A constant challenge for employers and human resources professionals is to ensure that anyone conducting job interviews be aware of questions that are impermissible and may violate state and federal discrimination laws. The California Fair Employment and Housing Commission State has produced a convenient guide to the type of questions that are permissible and not permissible. It is generally helpful to employers in all the fifty states. Although it is the employer's right to establish job-related requirements and to seek the most qualified individual for the job, the hiring decision cannot be made on the basis of any question that directly or indirectly: 1. Identifies a person on a basis covered by discrimination laws, or 2. Results in the disproportionate screening out of members of a protected group, or 3. Is not a valid predictor (not a job-related inquiry) of successful job performance. Federal and state laws generally prohibit employment decisions based upon such considerations as race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, medical condition, disability (including AIDS), marital status, sex (including pregnancy), and age (40+). A copy of the guide is provided at the end of this newsletter and is available online at: http://www.esrcheck.com/services/legal_illegal_questions.php 4. Safe Hiring Training Available on Video These are tough times for employers. You can be held responsible if you knew-or should have known-that someone you hired might pose an undue threat of harm to others. Yet, during the hiring process, you are required to navigate through a number of legal guidelines that are in place to protect the privacy of your applicants. ESR has helped to prepare a professional training video to help employers, HR professionals and Security professionals through the safe hiring process. In this video, you'll follow the fictional story of a company that makes a bad hire, and discover the steps they decide to put in place to ensure it doesn't happen again. As the story unfolds, the video explains the details of an effective safe hiring process, and sheds light on the legal background that you need to know. The video is available online at: http://www.esrcheck.com/safe_hiring_video.php Other educational opportunities where ESR is participating include: February 19, 2004--Newark/Fremont, CA-- Drugs, Sex and Murder--An Introduction to Safe Hiring and Pre-employment Screening in California. (A three hour workshop sponsored by he NCHRA-details to be announced) February 24, 2004--San Francisco, CA-- Drugs, Sex and Murder--An Introduction to Safe Hiring and Pre-employment Screening in California. (A three hour workshop sponsored by he NCHRA-details to be announced) March 10, 2004--Stockton, CA "Crimes, Criminals and Human Resources." San Joaquin Human Resource Association (SJHRA) at Noon. See www.sjhra.org April 20-21, 2004--Washington D.C. SHRM 35th Annual Employment Management Association (EMA) Conference and Exposition. Topic: -"Safe Hiring Audit-Implementing and Measuring Due Diligence in Your Hiring." Contact ESR for further details. Please feel free to contact Jared Callahan at ESR at 415-898-0044 or jcallahan@esrcheck.com if you have any questions or comments about the matters in this newsletter. Please note that ESR's statements about any legal matters are not given or intended as legal advice. Employment
Screening Resources (ESR) Guide to Permissible and Impermissible Questions:
NOTE: Any inquiry, even though neutral on its face, which has an adverse impact upon persons on a basis enumerated in the Fair Employment and Housing Act (race, sex, national origin, etc.), is permissible only if it is sufficiently related to an essential job function to warrant its use. |
Safe Hiring Resources Video clips used by permission of Kantola Productions The advantages of having ESR as your Safe Hiring Partner » The ESR Joint Commission Hospital Compliance Database » ESR Global Service — International background checks » Testimonials »» |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||